- Transcription errors cluster on names, jargon, accents and crosstalk.
- Speaker labels can put words in the wrong mouth.
- Summaries can merge numbers, drop disagreements and invent tidy conclusions.
- Check numbers, names, owners and dates against the transcript before sharing.
Where errors happen
- Audio: laptop mics, echoey rooms, people far from the mic.
- Words: names, company and product terms, acronyms, and numbers ("fifteen" vs "fifty").
- Overlap: two people talking at once is where transcripts break most.
- Speakers: similar voices or people sharing one microphone get mixed up.
- Summaries: language models write fluent, confident text even when the source was ambiguous.
The summary errors that cost most
- Rounded or merged numbers. "1.8 crore" and "2 crore" become "about 2 crore".
- Wrong owner. "Can you send it?" assigned to whoever spoke next.
- Disagreement smoothed over. Two people disagreed; the summary says "the team agreed".
- Tentative becomes final. "Let's think about March" becomes "Launch in March".
A five-minute check
- Search the transcript for every number in the summary and confirm it.
- Confirm each action has the right owner and date.
- Read the decisions aloud: were they really decided?
- Fix any name spellings.
- Add anything you know mattered that the AI missed.
Improving accuracy
- Better microphones beat better models.
- Add names and terms to the tool's vocabulary if it supports it.
- Ask people to finish their point before the next person starts.
Platforms say this too: university guidance on Zoom's AI features warns that transcripts and summaries will contain inaccuracies that need review (Georgetown University).
Questions people ask
Are AI meeting summaries reliable?
Why do AI transcripts get names wrong?
How do I make AI meeting notes more accurate?
Sources
Checked 11 November 2026. Spotted something out of date? Write to [email protected].
About Shin. We’re building something for people whose work happens in conversation. Private beta, by invitation.
Request access →