Handwriting vs typing notes: what the research actually says

A 2014 study made 'the pen is mightier than the keyboard' famous. Later replications tell a quieter story.

In short
  • Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014) found laptop note-takers did worse on conceptual questions.
  • A 2021 direct replication with 142 students found no significant difference.
  • Typed notes do tend to be longer and more verbatim in both studies.
  • The medium matters less than writing selectively and reviewing your notes.

The study everyone quotes

In 2014, Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer published "The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard" in Psychological Science. Students watched recorded talks while taking notes by hand or on a laptop, then took a quiz. The laptop group took longer, more word-for-word notes, and in the first study did worse on conceptual questions. The authors suggested that writing by hand forces you to summarise, and summarising helps understanding.

The paper was widely covered, and many lecturers banned laptops in class on the strength of it.

What happened when others repeated it

In 2021, Heather Urry and colleagues at Tufts University published a direct replication of the first study in the same journal. With 142 participants, the laptop group again took more words and more verbatim notes, but quiz performance did not differ significantly between the two groups, for factual or conceptual questions (Association for Psychological Science).

The same paper pooled eight similar studies in a small meta-analysis and again did not find a reliable advantage for longhand. The authors concluded that the results "do not support the idea that longhand note taking improves immediate learning via better encoding of information." An earlier replication by Morehead and colleagues (2019) reported a weaker effect than the original as well.

What this means for meetings

The studies were about students and lectures, not meetings, and none of them allowed people to review their notes before the quiz. So be careful extending them. Still, three practical points hold up:

  • Choose the medium you are fastest and most comfortable with. The evidence no longer says one is clearly better.
  • Don't transcribe. Both studies found typing pushes people toward verbatim notes. Selecting what matters is the useful part.
  • Review soon. Notes only help if you read them again, ideally the same day.

One exception: exact words

There are moments where verbatim is exactly what you want: a number, a commitment, a quote you'll need to repeat. Write those word for word, whatever you're writing with. Everything else, put in your own words.

Questions people ask

Is it better to take notes by hand or on a laptop?
Current evidence does not show a reliable difference. A 2021 replication of the well-known 2014 study found no significant difference in quiz performance between laptop and longhand note-takers.
Why do people say handwriting is better for memory?
A 2014 study by Mueller and Oppenheimer found laptop note-takers did worse on conceptual questions, possibly because they transcribed instead of summarising. Later replications did not confirm the effect.
Do typed notes contain more words?
Yes. Both the original study and the 2021 replication found typed notes were longer and contained more verbatim wording.
What actually helps notes work?
Writing selectively in your own words, recording exact numbers and commitments verbatim, and reviewing notes soon after.

Sources

About Shin. We’re building something for people whose work happens in conversation. Private beta, by invitation.

Request access →